The massacre of at least 49 people – in and just outside two mosques in Christchurch – this afternoon (Friday, March 15) is a horror that has shocked much of the country. People are saying ‘not here’. Ok, that’s understandable. However we will only make progress where we’re like ‘not anywhere’.
Prime minister Jacinda Ardern has condemned the massacre, but the awful reality is that the New Zealand state has carried out or been a party to massacres of Muslim villages and communities in Afghanistan and Iraq for decades. Where was the condemnation when it was carried out by heavily armed state forces? Labour, National and nearly every parliamentary party and member has directly overseen and/or gone along with the state terrorism. These activities have occurred under governments led by both main parties. And when Nicky Hager and Jon Stephenson exposed NZ state atrocities in Afghanistan the previous and current government turned a blind eye and aided the cover-up.
It was the rhetoric and warmongering against Islamic countries waged by the Western powers for the past two decades that created the ideological backdrop for far-right attacks on Muslim communities. When the cold war came to an end the old communist bogeyman was replaced by the Muslim bogeyman.
On top of this, all the parliamentary parties favour immigration controls which demonise particular sets of immigrants, especially those from East Asia and the Middle East, setting up the idea that people from these region are less legitimate as NZ citizens. In recent years, Labour has a particularly atrocious record in relation to demonising immigrants, thereby contributing to the anti-immigrant poison which people like the white racists behind this attack draw from ideologically. Labour in opposition kept banging the anti-immigration drum. Andrew Little in 2017 claimed that migrants were clogging up the roads, filling the houses and taking jobs. It’s time for a breather on immigration he said. Phil Twyford, announced a “tsunami of Chinese money” was heading to our shores. He claimed 60% of house sales in Auckland were to Chinese buyers – a false and xenophobic statement.
The people who administer the NZ imperialist state can wring their hands and issue their moral condemnations, but a good deal of responsibility for this bloodshed lies with them. And while issuing their moral condemnations, they will continue to wreak carnage in the Third World and maintain immigration control that delegitimise the presence in New Zealand of the victim of these attacks. And the state will continue to tool up. That, of course, won’t even help public safety. The state has increased ‘anti-terrorism’ laws since 2001 and intensified its spying capabilities. Its monitoring has been directed at Islamic communities and the far left, but it is the far right that is more likely to carry out acts of mass terror.
Redline stands in solidarity with the bereaved family and friends of the victims. And we stand in solidarity with the peoples of the Third World who are on the receiving end of the bombs and bullets delivered by order of people like Scott Morrison and Jacinda Ardern.
Redline 
You’ve raised good points about the wider context on the governmental level. The rhetoric from the Green Party and, NZ First has been petty nationalist in the case of the former (their rhetoric around the TPPA for example and generally supporting local capitalists and ‘our’ resources against ‘foreign’ capital) and outright racist at times in the case of the latter “Two Wongs don’t make a white” in addition to their immigration policies of course. Labour has no problem working alongside those parties, being in power is more important to them all.
LikeLike
Yes, every party in parliament has been backing imperialist interventions and nationalism in varying degrees. Sometimes Labour has even outdone NZ First eg indulging in anti-Chinese rhetoric. It was Labour in government under Helen Clark’s leadership that signed up to the invasion of Afghanistan.
LikeLike
[…] This article originally appeared on Redline. […]
LikeLike
[…] „The massacre in Christchurch: individual terrorism was nurtured by state terrorism“ am 15. Mär… ist eine Stellungnahme des linken neuseeländischen Magazins zum Massenmord, der die offizielle Verurteilung des Verbrechens durch die Regierung gegenüberstellt mit deren ewig währenden Beteiligung an den Kriegen in Afghanistan und im Irak und ihren endlosen „Kollateralschäden“. Die Kriegsrhetorik gegen islamisch geprägte Länder, die in den beiden letzten Jahrzehnten von allen Regierungen benutzt worden sei, habe den ideologischen Hintergrund für die rechtsradikale Interpretation geschaffen, die im Terror münde. Die fremdenfeindlichen Attacken, die auch Abgeordnete und andere Mandatsträger der Regierungspartei im letzten Wahlkampf betrieben haben – wie etwa die falsche Behauptung, 60% aller Hauskäufe in Auckland seien „von Chinesen“ – hätten zur konkreten Ausformung der reaktionären Ideologie ebenso beigetragen, wie die seit langen Jahren immer weiter verfolgte sogenannte Sicherheitspolitik, deren polizeistaatliche Umsetzung stets gegen islamische Gemeinschaften und linke Gruppierungen gerichtet seien und niemals gegen die wachsenden rechten Netzwerke. […]
LikeLike
[…] „The massacre in Christchurch: individual terrorism was nurtured by state terrorism“ am 15. Mär… ist eine Stellungnahme des linken neuseeländischen Magazins zum Massenmord, der die offizielle Verurteilung des Verbrechens durch die Regierung gegenüberstellt mit deren ewig währenden Beteiligung an den Kriegen in Afghanistan und im Irak und ihren endlosen „Kollateralschäden“. Die Kriegsrhetorik gegen islamisch geprägte Länder, die in den beiden letzten Jahrzehnten von allen Regierungen benutzt worden sei, habe den ideologischen Hintergrund für die rechtsradikale Interpretation geschaffen, die im Terror münde. Die fremdenfeindlichen Attacken, die auch Abgeordnete und andere Mandatsträger der Regierungspartei im letzten Wahlkampf betrieben haben – wie etwa die falsche Behauptung, 60% aller Hauskäufe in Auckland seien „von Chinesen“ – hätten zur konkreten Ausformung der reaktionären Ideologie ebenso beigetragen, wie die seit langen Jahren immer weiter verfolgte sogenannte Sicherheitspolitik, deren polizeistaatliche Umsetzung stets gegen islamische Gemeinschaften und linke Gruppierungen gerichtet seien und niemals gegen die wachsenden rechten Netzwerke. […]
LikeLike